Cursor and OpenAI Codex compared side by side: pricing, platforms, features, pros and cons, from the facts in our listings.

Cursor
AI coding agent and code editor
89/100Our scoreAccess 22/25 · Platforms 12/20 · Features 20/20 · Use cases 10/10 · Pricing transparency 15/15 · Adoption 10/10How we score
Visit Cursor 
OpenAI Codex
OpenAI's coding agent for real engineering work
73/100Our scoreAccess 9/25 · Platforms 20/20 · Features 20/20 · Use cases 10/10 · Pricing transparency 7/15 · Adoption 7/10How we score
Visit OpenAI Codex | Feature | Cursor | OpenAI Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 89/100 | 73/100 |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $8/month (Plus, Grok models only) | Paid |
| Platforms | macOS, Windows, Linux | Web, macOS, Windows, Linux, API |
| Categories | AI Coding Assistants | AI Coding Assistants, AI Agents & Automation |
| Key features |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Last checked | October 22, 2026 | October 18, 2026 |
Which should you choose?
- Choose Cursor if you mainly need building features from a prompt.
- Choose OpenAI Codex if you mainly need delegating coding tasks.
- On price: Cursor is freemium and OpenAI Codex is paid.
- Both run on macOS, Windows, Linux.
Our score is calculated from the facts in each listing with a published rubric (how we score); it is not a hands-on benchmark. Confirm prices on the official sites before you buy.